|
|

3/31/2004
Gay Channel Pushes Me Over the Edge
It was only a matter of time. Conversation has resurfaced regarding Viacom's plans to establish a Gay and Lesbian Channel. With ABC and Bravo, I thought we already had a gay channel? Enough is enough. Did you know there's a "Gay Financial Network" (GFN)? What in Sam Hill does being gay have to do with finances? And people say there's no such thing as a "gay agenda". EDITED 04/01: Let me clarify. Being gay has a LOT to do with finances. Like say for example, transferring generational wealth. John Maynard Keynes was a famous British economist. He also happened to be gay (even thought he was married). The underlying theory of his economics lacked the aspect of generational wealth. Why? Gay men don't procreate so their view on economics is different. We're in la-la land if we don't think the homosexual agenda affects the economy.
I am being challeged as of late with regards to my emotion around those who haven chosen this alternative lifestyle. Recently, I've started a new business and one of the guys I am working with is gay. I went to both high school and college with many a gay and lesbian folk and I live in a city that aspires to be the next San Francisco so despising the sin and loving the person has been my mantra in life. However, working so closely with someone in a venture that is very important to me has brought some challenges. Aside from his overwhelming use of the word, "yummy" which irks the heck out of me, I think I can deal. I am however, certainly being reminded of a lot of my own issues and judgements and this is a growing experience for me. God is so tremendous in His love for everyone; more tremendous than I could ever be.
posted by ambra at 3/31/2004 11:19:58 PM | link to this entry |
|
Pornography Regulation
Much talk has been bounced around lately regarding a proposal for a dot-xxx internet suffix. This is not a new concept, however buy-in has been sketchy all around. The idea is that pornographic sites would voluntary take on a dot-xxx domain name. No sites would be required to relinquish their current domain names but they'd simply take on an alias. Newer pornography sites would take on the dot-xxx suffix for more promotion. Internet surfers would know that anything with dot-xxx after it was a pornographic site. Proponents say it would make regulation of child pornography simpler and allow parents to easily block out pornographic sites. Opponents argue that the dot-xxx concept is unrealistic and won't work. Opponents of dot-xxx aren't all in agreement with pornography. They just think this is not the way to go. I'm somewhat baffled on what to think about this issue. I think policing the internet world-wide is a pipe dream. It's a living organism that is completely out of control. It's that very same lack of regulation which has yet to be fully taken advantage of by those who know the truth. The majority of content on the internet is sexually related. This is not the result of freedom of speech or poor internet regulations. That is the result of people who are empty. That is the pulse of the world. Sexual immorality was the downfall of many in the past. King David, Sodom, and Babylon come to mind. You can't rid the internet of pornography without treating the root problem which is people who desire to look at it. So my question would be, to what measure are we able to regulate pornography on the web? And How?
posted by ambra at 3/31/2004 10:10:33 PM | link to this entry |
|
Missing College Student Found?
Four days ago, news reports were out on a missing college student Audrey Seiler at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She was missing for four days and was found today. There appeared to be no foul play and the "suspect" hasn't been found. Call me cynical and rude, (I happen to think I'm just discerning), but I suspect this whole thing was a hoax. I'm usually pretty good at calling these things. People these days do sick things for attention. Last year, a woman here in Seattle locked herself in her own trunk and pretended she was kidknapped. I of course could be wrong. In which case, I'm glad she's alright. However, something tells me she was alright in the first place.
posted by ambra at 3/31/2004 09:59:28 PM | link to this entry |
|
Greek Societies: Network Mixers or Bourgeois Gangs?
So I was on the plane home from Dallas, (which by the way was an arduous 3.75 hour flight -- two hours is fine, so is eight, I've even been on an 18 hour flight and it wasn't that bad, but 3.75 hours is just plain torture) and I met someone. I'm a fairly friendly person and if I'm really charged, I'll seek to do as much airplane proselytizing as possible. However, this particular trip I was zonked and didn't feel much like talking. That's usually when you get seated next to "Chatty" Cathy who wants to tell you about the excema on the back of her son's neck.
In this case I had been seated next to a man who introduced himself as the 31st president of a major fraternity. Keep in mind, it takes quite a "title" to impress me. Unfortunately, this was not one of them. Now if he said "I am the Christ" that would've been something to get excited (or worried) about. So my response to him introducing himself as president was, "Oh that's nice. I lived in a dorm with a couple of "Sigmas"." Little did he know what I really thought of them. It turns out this fraternity president was flying into Seattle for the "West Coast Regional Conference". We talked some, he opened up about being in the midst of a divorce, I challenged him on his reasons for the divorce (yes I'm that bold) and I asked him his opinion on recent hazing scandal. We talked some more, the plane landed, he handed me his card, and I went on my merry way.
Talking with him got me charged up once again about this issue of Greek societies. The current issue of Newsweek has some discussion around the Freemasons, a known secret society. I'd certainly put Greek organizations in the category of "secret society".
A little background on black fraternities and sororities: They are highly elite and important organizations in the African-American collegiate community. Perhaps even more so than some prominent white Greek societies for reasons I'll expound upon in a bit. A good number of my family members are either Alpha Kappa Alpha (AKA) or Alpha Phi Alpha. I'm Alpha Omega, by the way, and that's all I'll ever be.
Growing up I was never much interested in pledging to a sorority. I'm far too independent and headstrong for that. If you've ever been a college student, you've been presented with the opportunity for life-long networking through your membership in a Greek society. I attended a small New England liberal arts college so Greek life wasn't really a big deal on campus. I think we had Psi Epsilon Chitty Chitty Bang Bang or something like that, but it was an academic honor society and nothing more. But for those desperate enough for social acceptance and clout, they sought refuge by pledging at a neighboring larger university like UConn. Larger universities tend to have a thriving "Greek Life.
Here in Seattle, the University of Washington campus which boasts some tens of thousands of students has what we call "Greek Row" which is where all the frats and sorities houses exist. "Greek row" is merely blocks of huge mansions specifically dedicated to binge drinking, topless dancing, mindless partying and other things of a similar idiotic nature. During my Freshman year at "Sin University" (my nickname) in Connecticut, there were a couple of "Sigma" guys in my dorm and one other guy pledging Alpha Phi Alpha. (Yes we had co-ed dorms, yes it was awkward, yes times have changed, and no I'd never send my kids there). I lived in a predominately black dorm my freshman year (I was in denial that I'd be living in Connecticut the next four years of my life). Living with people who are going through the process of handing over their soul to a Greek society was an experience I wish I didn't have.
The human need for acceptance is a God-given one. We as individuals long to feel a part of something tangible, real, and enduring. This is the phenomenon of the church. It's a live, breathing organism that is growing daily. I have trouble with any other organization requiring a person to "pledge" their complete loyalty and trust in it. That is a role only God deserves. The goal of Greek societies is "brotherhood and sisterhood" right? Well, why would people be seeking that outside of God's original intent that we have spiritual siblings in the body of Christ? There are four main commonalities that I see in most cults, gangs, secret societies, and Greek organizations.
Strange Initiation Tendencies In doing some research on the whole "hazing" practice, I found the process is really two-fold:- First they "break you down" by demoralizing and dehumanizing you in various and somewhat creative and sickening ways. The goal here is that you lose your personal identity and independence of association.
- After successfully "breaking you in" the "Brotherhood" then "builds you up" (AKA indoctrinate) with their way of thinking, philosophies, identity, and ultimately loyalty.
Sounds like modern-day gang initiation to me. Keep in mind, there are varying degrees to which these two steps take place, but they DO take place. Even in my conversation with the fraternity president, it is clear that though there may be an apparent "crack down" on hazing rituals across the country it is really just to appease university officials and to protect themselves from the onslaught of nasty lawsuits (of which there have been many recently in wake of some student deaths in the name of "hazing"). It's an attempt to "keep the monkey off their backs" so to speak, since Dateline, Nightline, 20/20 and just about every other primetime news show ran exposes on hazing rituals.
False Identity & Loyalty Interestingly enough, it is sometimes the insecure, those needing to find a place of acceptance, and those lacking true identity that are easily recruitable to a Greek society. In talking with a lot of college students in the throes of a society, their identity is generally wrapped around some aspect of their fraternity or sorority. That is their "second family". That is their "comfort zone". That is what they center their life around. Even those who sought out the elite club "just to party" or "just to network" are finding some sort of false identity in those things. The trust begins to turn to the relationships and not to God. I still have friends to this day who do not believe they are capable of landing a solid job without their "fraternity connection".
In college I watched once as two of my friends left to go have the "Sigma" sign BRANDED on their upper arms. Does this not seem bizarre to anyone? What are we cattle? That's not to mention the negative historical significance of branding. I could throw tattoos in there too but that might offend so I'll save that for rainy day. In all seriousness, in African-American fraternities, branding is a commonplace thing and it's repulsive. No group of people gets enough of my allegience to infuse their "logo or sign" onto my body with a hot iron. I don't belong to them, I belong to God.
Secrets & Lies When my friend Malik was pledging a few years ago, I would always ask him questions like, "Why are you limping?" or "What did they do to you?" or "What's this fraternity all about anyway?" and he'd quickly hush me and start whispering. He could never tell me what was going on. If fact, he couldn't tell anyone while he was pledging. Most Greek societies have some level of secrecy to them. Most will threaten to disassociate you from the fold should you divulge their secrets. Growing up I was always taught that anyone who is telling me to keep secrets from my family was evil. I think the theory still stands. On the extreme end, this is how cults get their grip on people. They put up barriers to the family. Greek societies are arguably not cults however they maintain cult-like tendancies and that's enough for me to see warning signs.
The Smokescreen of Good Works Most Greek societies sell themselves on the wonderful works they do for the community and young professionals. Many do in fact give much of their time to community service, set up scholarship funds, and have social programs that benefit others. It all sounds good, but if that were the standard used to separate those organizations that are good from evil, most all would be labeled "good". Even the Nation of Islam does some really "good" things to further social awareness and justice. I love the commercials produced by the Mormon Church. They're brilliant, they often speak truth, but man does it lead to confusion. We give too much credence to good works these days and fail to recognize that there are a lot of organizations, churches and religions doing an enormous amount of good works, and a whole lot of nothing that has eternal value.
Deception is not deception until what's false seems true. The best deception usually has a little bit of truth mixed in and that's why it's important we really examine some of these social organizations that have postured themselves for extreme deception. Greek societies have been around for years. Historically, African-Americans were "not included" in most organizations. The Reconstruction Era gave birth to historically black colleges, which gave birth to historically black fraternities and sororites and gave opportunities for many black people to "be a part" of something from which they were once excluded. While I don't doubt that at one point, their intentions were 100% good, I find that we have purposed as a society to fill every human void with a lame counterfeit.
Fraternities and sororities (black, white and everything in between) are a crutch for those who haven't fully joined themselves to the work God is doing on the Earth. The church is what's happening. It's the best network of people you'll ever meet. It will propel you to your destiny. You will have brothers and sisters for life. It doesn't require hazing rituals, but merely a firm decision to serve God. There you will find your real identity in God and He doesn't brand your body, but He brands your life.
posted by ambra at 3/31/2004 12:10:39 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/29/2004
10 11 Reasons Why I Love Dallas
I spent most of last week conducting some training in Dallas, Texas. I've got about 10 posts stored up as I missed out on some juicy news. Texas was probably on my list for the top 5 places I'd never want to live (along with Idaho, North Dakota, Iowa, and Utah). I am certain there are places in Texas that could very well be on that list; like Fort Worth or some of the other cities where the bottom-dwelling hicks live. But Dallas, Texas has now become one of my favorite places and this is why:- They have a Chapel in the airport
- The presence of two fast food chains: Chik-fil-A and Whataburger (who sells biscuits with chicken strips by the way. Biscuits!!!)
- White people who know how to barbeque and eat grits
- Peach cobbler and collard greens sold in the airport restaurants
- Being repeatedly called "Ma'am" by most everyone in a business establishment, including the gas station clerk.
- the presence of Christian bookstores within a 5 mile radius
- Four bedroom, 3 bathroom, 2500 square ft. homes for sale at the sickeningly low price of $175,000 (you'd be lucky to buy a 350 sq ft condo in Seattle for that price)
- The surprising number of "I Love Texas" bumper stickers I noticed let me know there's a bit of state pride goin' on. I dig that.
- Not nearly as many women with gaudy jewelry and big hair as I expected.
- No tree-huggers. This is mostly because there are no trees to hug, but their absence was appreciated nonetheless.
- Primetime starts at 7:00 pm (it took me half of my trip to figure out why I kept missing the Cosby Show)
posted by ambra at 3/29/2004 11:12:13 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/23/2004
Passion is Unseeded
If you hadn't heard, this past weekend, the thriller about the "dead" rising, Dawn of the Dead knocked The Passion out of its number one box office seat. I'll let you draw your own conclusions there.... But I'll just say this: it's no coicidence that the movie to oust the Passion is one that deals with darkness, confusion and death. There's a lot more that could be said there but what's the point? The Passion still has the number two slot and predictions for how it will finish are still changing every week. Mel has long been vindicated.
posted by ambra at 3/23/2004 09:07:50 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/22/2004
So My Generation's Voting for Nader? The State of the Young Adult Union
Figures. He would court the young adult vote. Let's just keep in mind the fact that my generation doesn't do their homework. That's why we're so heavily marketed to in just about everything. If it's on TV or in a movie, we'll usually buy it no matter how crappy the quality is. So the fact that we're the ones voting for Nader doesn't surprise me in the least. And what about soon to be voters and the freshly inaugurated into the voting sphere? You know, that 17-20 year old crowd? Well, they've got folks like hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons telling them who to vote for. Well, essentially. You can pretty much guarantee he's not rallying behind anyone but a staunch democrat. If you hadn't heard, Simmons is spearheading a movement called "Team Vote" via the Hip-Hop Summit Action Network to rally the hip-hop community (both artists and listeners) to vote. The first thing you'll see on their site is a picture of the black rights spokesman, Jesse Jackson. It's actually quite a brilliant concept considering hip-hop is the top selling musical form. And to think, you thought it was country! This is a brave new world and hip-hop sells, hip-hop influences, and hip-hop transcends.
The "Rock the Vote" campaign is all about registering voters. They have some goals as well (some good, some not so good), found on their website. There they've listed all their "wants" in politics which include everything from eradication of poverty and cesnorship laws to reparations, and the total elimination of racism, hate and bigotry. Side note, racism, hate and bigotry will always exist as long as there's sin on the Earth. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that that Russell Simmons isn't chanting "Vote Bush". Not all of Team Votes's goals are bad, in fact some are quite good. Many of them speak to social action. This is often where I and conservatives part.
There is a lot of hesitancy amongst conservatives and Christians as well, to get involved with the community beyond the suburbs. I'm talking the poor, the wounded, and the disenfranchised. This is unfortunate as Democrats, Liberals, the Green Party, and many others have recognized this hole and rushed to fill it with silly in-effective programs and legislation. It's sort of like the city road crew in Seattle and the pothole problem. Every time a pothole pops up, the city comes out and fills it; with asphalt. Asphalt is cheap, it's easy to get a hold of, and it does the job temporarily. But just let it rain. You can pretty much guarantee that in a high-traffic area, it'll only be a matter of months before that same pothole is back again. So why don't they use cement or something else that will hold? Well, it's all an effort to keep taxes high, jobs flowing, and work available. The city is very intentional about the work they do not lasting too long. Such is the same as many of these "social programs" that have been instituted over the years. They're not doing anything productive for the inner city or impoverished communities. They're just paying somebody's paycheck. They're after quick-fixes and not lasting fruit.
When we consider the hip-hop generation, we're talking about a group of people who are pretty much fed up with the world as is. That's a big plus for my generation. We're not into business as usual and we're very loyal to a cause no matter how illogical. The downside is, we're also a licentious group of folks. We live by the morally relativistic creed of "if it feels right do it" so we're not bound to take well to anyone telling us we shouldn't do anything like have sex before marriage, use mind-altering substances, have abortions, or disrespect our parents. The ignorant will capitalize on this and lead us further into the abyss of rebellion. The wise will realize that the "rebellion" is merely a front and what we're really seeking after is truth. Once truth is revealed to us properly, we will be hopelessly devoted to it, worship it, preach it, write it, rap about it, sing about it, and live it unashamedly.
posted by ambra at 3/22/2004 06:14:00 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/18/2004
Just When you Thought MTV Couldn't Get any Lower...
 They come out with another reality series, "I Want a Famous Face". Weight loss regimens are great. So is a little hair dye, but MTV's new show, which only recently began airing, chronicles the process from start to finish as unsuspecting young adults and teenagers subject themselves to the hands of plastic surgeons who slice up their bodies to resemble their most admired celebrity. Can we say sick? Voyeurs indulge themselves by watching these people painfully endure not-so-glamorous surgeries, cheek and chin implants, butt lifts, rhinoplasty and horrendous healing processes all to look like: JLo or Elvis? Give me a break. Here in America, we have young people trying to commit suicide because they're so displeased with how they look, and MTV takes it one step further by endorsing their right to want to look like someone else. My generation is already in the throes of an extreme identity crisis and this is why. There is a message constantly flashed before us that declares we should not be happy with who God created us to be. Meanwhile, we're fantasizing about looking or being like someone else, failing to realize that "someone" probably is just as insecure if not more so, and doesn't even know their own identity. The lost are chasing after the lost. Poor self-image has been the downfall of humanity. I am so looking forward to the day when people will find their confidence in who they were created to be -- individual. There is a major restoration of identity that needs to come to the pop culture generation. We have too many clones walking around. I fear we're missing out on the gifts and talents of an entire generation because nobody wants to be an original.
posted by ambra at 3/18/2004 11:21:29 AM | link to this entry |
|
In A Similar Vein...Seattle Minister Charged With Violating "Church Law"
It is interesting, there is much controversy being caused here in Seattle over a United Methodist Church minister who is also a lesbian. This week, trials began against "Rev." Karen Dammann and her right to remain a minister in the Methodist church although she is involved in a lesbian relationship. While here the UMC in Seattle maintains that they are a "welcoming and affirming church" for gays and lesbians (note: here in Seattle, "affirming" means "agreeing, encouraging, and approving"), they don't allow their clergy to participate in homosexual relationships. So can someone please help me understand what this trial is all about? My simple mind just does not understand what the debate is about. Even more strange is the extensive coverage of the trial including pictures of protesters, the UMC has posted on their website. Thus far, there have already been 33 arrests of protesters both for and against Rev. Dammann remaining part of the clergy. This is an issue that will continue to be in the press and there needs to be a clear stance on what the Bible says concerning it. More photos from the hubbub...

 NY Times covers the trial as well.
posted by ambra at 3/18/2004 09:13:20 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/17/2004
The Gay & Lesbian Church
I'll be travelling to Dallas on business soon so yesterday, I searched on the internet to find a church in the area. Even when I'm away from home, I like fellowshipping with other local bodies of believers. It's a sad reality when you can't just open the phonebook and pick a church -- Not even in the Bible belt. For this reason I usually go on recommendation of a friend. I'm not interested in stale worship, lack of diversity, long dresses/no make-up, or heretical teaching. I want to visit someplace where the spirit of God is alive and present and the teaching is relevant. Somehow via a google search, I arrived here. "The Cathedral of Hope" has dubbed themself, the "World's Largest Gay and Lesbian Church". What an accolade eh? Now I live in Seattle so little suprises me. In fact, Seattle itself has a growing number of gay and lesbain churches. This particular church appears to be part of the UCC (United Church of Christ) denomination. The website itself is perhaps one of the most disturbing things I've seen this week. It's rather extensive.
For the sake of my assertions, let's recognize that the word "church" is not a super-spiritual word. In Greek, it is "ekklesia" which simply means "called out ones". So essentially, a "church" is merely a called out group of people. For the Cathedral of Hope or any other group of people to call themselves a "church" is fine by me. They can even preach false doctrine and manipulate the Bible to say what they desire it to say. That's fine too. I just hope they (and we) realize that is not the Church of Jesus Christ. I also hope that they realize that they will give and account to God for the masses of people they've influenced by their false teaching. And let's be honest, it is false. Any church whose entire purpose and function is centered on a lifestyle the Bible clearly opposes is a lie no matter how much truth they may be preaching.
In Matthew 16:18 Jesus declares that He is building His church, "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades (Hell) will not overcome it (prevail against it)." Was Jesus declaring that He's building His church on Peter? No. He's building His church on the revelation that Peter had in the prior verse, and that is the revelation of who Jesus Christ is. We are the church, so the verb "building" doesn't speak to constructing something material, it speaks to "establishing" something eternal. It is imperative we remember in this day and age that there are many people building many churches. There's the Church of Humanism, Socialism, the Homosexual Church, the Church of Capitalism, the Church of Education, the Church of Scientology. These are not the church that Jesus Christ declared He is building. Many churches are being built on the revelation of who Jesus Christ is not. As believers, we need to have Godly discernment to recognize the fruit of the church of Jesus Christ and call the lie for what it is.
In a practical sense, one huge red flag I find *sometimes* is when churches call themselves the "church of christ" or "the church of jesus christ". Usually, if you have to state what you are, instead of just being what you are, there's an insecurity present. Typically, that insecurity exists because you are indeed not what you say you are. This is not always the case. I can hear the comments from COGIC (Church of God in Christ) people already. Don't email me please. I merely use an extreme to prove a point. We must judge what is truly "the church" based on the fruit they produce and the standards we see in the Bible. We must not judge based on what people say, but what they do. I desire to be a part of the church that Jesus Christ is building and nothing else.
A huge burden rests on the believers in Jesus Christ. There should always be a distinction between the church that Jesus is building and every other church. As it stands, we have given a lot of people cause to be confused because many churches have failed to make that distinction. It's time to get rid of the grey areas folks. This is not a game. There are too many lives at stake and my stomach churns to think that people would confuse the "Cathedral of Foolishness" for the "Cathedral of Hope".
Incidentally, should anyone have recommendations on a great Dallas, Bible-teaching (full Bible, not partial :-) church where the spirit of God is always present, shoot it my way.
posted by ambra at 3/17/2004 10:52:04 AM | link to this entry |
|
Whitney Enters Drug Rehab
It was reported yesterday that singer Whitney Houston entered drug rehabilitation. Sometimes it seems as though people have to hit the lowest point before they are restored. It's often a Biblical pattern of how God does things. Bobby Brown and Whitney Houston are the poster children for how fame and fortune can ruin a person. The lust of the eyes, lust of the flesh, and the pride of life. It gets us everytime. God protect their offspring.
posted by ambra at 3/17/2004 10:35:14 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/16/2004
Disney to Bring C.S. Lewis to the Big Screen
Walt Disney has plans in the works to bring to film, C.S. Lewis' classic The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. I hope C.S. Lewis doesn't roll over in his grave (what a morbid saying. Who made that up? Christians shouldn't say that. It's not even Biblical. Shame Ambra). Although Disney has denied that the film will have Christian connotations (I'd expect nothing else from them), who knows, perhaps it's a great thing. C.S. Lewis was an incredibly influential writer. In terms of production, Disney wouldn't have been my first choice, but neither was broccoli and I love it now. Unfortunately, I only "love" broccoli when it's slathered with butter and salt and all the nutrients are completely cooked out. Let's just hope that's not what happens to the C.S. Lewis' masterpiece. I'd like to see it go to the big screen raw.
posted by ambra at 3/16/2004 07:21:30 PM | link to this entry |
|
A Moral Hollywood?
Today I read an article in the New York Times called "Hollywood Rethinking Faith Films After 'Passion'. The article really stirred something in me rather unrelated to the title. While Hollywood is wiping the nasty after taste of their feet out of their collective mouths, it is interesting to follow as critics kick around various issues as it relates to God and movies. Though the Passion is predicted to surpass even box office sales for the Matrix trilogy, movie executives aren't 100% convinced they'll jump to imitate. Although, I am certain they want to. In the article, movie producer Michael Nozick said, "You can't deny when a movie makes that kind of money that the audience has spoken to the filmmaking community, but it's a frightening comment." Indeed it is frightening for them. Hollywood salivates over success like that of Mel Gibson, but even Warner Brothers' president of production admitted, "I wouldn't know how to duplicate this". Hollywood's fear is rightly justified. The mold that may have worked in the past of pushing out mindless box office hits can't really be applied to God or His Word. Hollywood's fear is that they would attempt a work like the Passion and fail miserably.
There has long been contempt in the movie industry of an absolute good and evil. The statement in the article that really struck a chord with me read, "As divisions of major media conglomerates concerned with their public image, Hollywood studios have historically shied away from all but the most benign values, like friendship, family and love. Movies with strong points of view -- political and particularly religious -- have had difficulty receiving green lights." This is what is shocking so many about the Passion. It is doing well despite pushback from the major media conglomerates. The author of the article is absolutely right. The values in Hollywood are watered down and tired. The combined work of filmmakers over the last 20-30 years has left a gaping hole in the consciousness of humanity. In other words, it's done absolutely nothing. Ask the average person about the last movie they saw that completely changed their life and they may have an answer for you twenty minutes later if at all. Film has been relegated to insipid tales of friendship and foe, 18th century epic sagas, stories on the endurance of the "human spirit", and action-packed special effects thrillers of an erethreal Jesus. And yes, I too loved and found insight in the Matrix. We don't need more Christian movies. We need more movies that are Christian. What's the difference? Instead of pushing a Biblical worldivew, we've pushed a "Christianized American" worldview. Let's just be honest. Stereotypical American Christianity is dull. We have downgraded Christian films to "end-time depictions" with hokey salvation messages. The world is not hungry for epic films characterized by men with beards and tunics. The world is not hungry for "Christianized" films with crappy production. The world is hungry for Truth. This I believe, is the main draw of The Passion. The world is hungry for a message that can be translated in more than just a literal gospel account, but how that account affects the lives of humanity. Package it as you may, but Truth will always be the best seller as far as I am concerned. It is only a matter of time. Nature abhors a vacuum and wherever we as believers fail to make the truth known, the lie comes in full of fluff. Martin Luther (no not King) spoke to this point exactly:
"If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christ. Where the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved and to be steady on all the battlefield besides is mere flight and disgrace if he flinches at that one point."
For far too long, Christians have shot blanks with our theology. We often address everything except the very point that is being attacked by the world. Our message is too infrequently relevant. This may seem unrelated, but guess who is one of the greatest "pastors" of women in our current day? Oprah Winfrey. That is a sad reality. Realize my working definition of "pastor" is merely "shepherd". Oprah is filling a void on television. Some years back she coined the phrase "Change Your Life Television". That was in my opinion, a major blow to the work Christians have done in the television industry because it clearly showed we weren't changing lives nor were we particularly relevant.
Should Hollywood begin to embark on a new outlook of "Faith films" they will eventually be forced to grapple with the Truth. What is it? Why are people drawn to it? How do we present it? What does it look like? I only hope that Believers are in position to answer.
posted by ambra at 3/16/2004 02:54:11 PM | link to this entry |
|
Another Passion?
It starts! Did you think that the Passion would rake in the money without the phonies on the trail? Guy Ritchie (aka husband of that fake blonde chick who can't sing Madonna), has plans to make a "religious" film called "Revolver". Fortunately, he's been unable to secure a studio deal due to references made to Kabbalah which is a Jewish form of mysticism, AKA a cult, and a new "trend" among celebrities. I suppose Kabbalah is what Scientology was to the 70's. Both Madonna and her husband share this religion. Has not the world yet realized that Madonna is confused? Try as you may Mr. Richie, no false spirituality will draw the masses like the account of the redemptive work of Christ.
posted by ambra at 3/16/2004 12:36:09 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/15/2004
The Penthouse
Repentance. It's a word not used often enough by those who are believers in Jesus Christ. Even when used, it is usually not used correctly or understood to its fullest extent. The Bible speaks of repentance often. Jesus himself preached it numerous times throughout the Gospels. In fact, we all know that repentance is necessary for entering into the fullness of what God has for us as even Jesus declared, in Luke 5:32, "I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance". Another message Jesus preached that we should be preaching is, "Repent for the Kingdom of God has arrived or in some translations (is at hand)".
Growing up in the church, the message I heard preached overwhelmingly was the message of forgiveness: that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for our sins. Even as a child, I recall the sinner's prayer and those words they taught us to lead non-believers to salvation. I remember many times while growing up, asking for God's forgiveness for stealing candy, staying up past my bedtime or lying to my parents. I always knew that no matter what I did, or how many times I did it, God would forgive me. I was right in thinking this because God's faithful and just to do it. In fact, forgiveness of sins has been the hallmark of most great 20th century evangelical movements; Billy Graham Crusades being a perfect example. Forgiveness is a popular message. It's a message of hope, relief, restoration, and most importantly, it touches humanity at its most weak and feeble place, sin. Only over the last couple of years have I realized a need for a message much less popular among believers and non-believers alike. It is the message of repentance. Too oft, it seems we confuse forgiveness and repentance. The Bible itself makes a clear distinction between the two. Luke 24:46-47 says, "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem." Interesting that Jesus makes a distinction between repentance and forgiveness of sins. Much of the New Testament goes on to declare and repeat what is stated in this passage. This is also the very message that even John the Baptist preached in preparing the way for the coming Savior. Is it enough to just be forgiven? "Repent" is a hard word to swallow. The "p" sound in "pent" sort of cuts you in the jugular of your pride. What? Repent? Me? It is much easier for us to ask God to forgive us and leave well enough alone. God does His part as His word declares, and we sort of do ours. We move on with the intention of never committing that sin again. Sometimes we're successful and sometimes we fall. However, if we do fall, we know God will forgive us. Repentance on the other hand, is an act of our will. The burden of repentance does not rest on God's shoulders, but on ours. The word "repent" itself is teeming with depth. The Greek word for repent is metanoeo which essentially means, "to change your mind". Looking even to our own English derivative. The prefix "re" implies that we are doing something again or establishing once again a reality that already existed. "Pent" has been commonly known to mean five, but it also means "upper" or "top" thus the word "penthouse"; the fancy apartment at the top of the building. We must call true repentance what it is: a turning away. Repentance is a made up mind to turn away from a lifestyle, a habit, an addiction, an idol, but most importantly, a way of thinking. Repentance is reclaiming our "top mind", the original mind God has given us. Repentance is returning to how God originally intended us to think, act, do, and speak. Dare I say many Christians these days have sought forgiveness, but have not yet demonstrated true repentance? I am overwhelmingly frustrated with Christians who lead a defeated life. Each day is a struggle and they continue to slip back into old habits and old ways of thinking. I realize there are various levels of growth amongst us all. This walk of faith is truly a process and the gamut of Christianity encompasses many levels. However, I cannot tell you how many Born Again Christians I encounter that face the same struggles they did 23 years ago when they first found God. I believe repentance is the key missing in lives of many a believer. So many Christians have yet to completely turn their mind around. They've only made it about 90 degrees or so. I often admonish believers to seek after the mind and purpose God originally intended for us. When we grab a hold of that, we will be unstoppable. I believe this is why the enemy wages war so heavily on the minds of humanity. Schizophrenia, Bi-Polar Disorder, Psychosis, and Depression are just names we've assigned to a disease that's been at work in the spiritual realm since sin entered the picture. It is the attack on the sound mind God gave us in the beginning. We have a poor self-image and we are unable to see who God has truly created us to be: victorious. This is why the Bible commands us to renew our minds. The awesomeness of God is that He has given us the tools we need to live a Godly life. We need Him for repentance. We can't do what He's called us to do without Him, but it is ultimately our choice. God is a gentleman; He does not force us to choose Him. Is the God we serve not great enough to deliver us from everything that is not like Him? I wouldn't serve Him if He wasn't. That is true grace. Grace is not just "unmerited favor" as we so often say, nor is it a cover up for us to live "free" and sin. First Peter declares that the true grace of God is divine enablement or, the power in Him to do everything He's calling us to do. To repent is much more than simply asking for forgiveness. Anyone can do that. Repentance is a choice to die to what we desire and live in who God originally intended us to be. Repentance is the path less traveled, but a made up mind is not easily swayed. We need to bring our minds from the basement and begin functioning out of that lavish penthouse of reason and soundness God has given us. God is not just calling us to seek His forgiveness, He's calling us to seek His face, turn away from the things that do not glorify Him, and reclaim our "top mind" to the glory of Him.
posted by ambra at 3/15/2004 01:59:23 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/13/2004
Rounding Up the Week
It shouldn't be forgotten the devastation of human life that has taken place in Spain recently. I feel the need to mention it above all the news below since clearly it should take precedence. My prayer is for the families and that God be glorified in this situation. How soon we all forget.
Woman Accused of Murder for Refusing a C-Section In an attempts to save one of twins born to Melissa Ann Rowland, doctors insisted she have a cesearean section. When Rowland refused, the baby was stillborn. She is now in jail charged with criminal homicide and child endangerment (un-related). Of course now people are charging that she is mentally ill in order to discredit this story. Critics are already talking about how this case may seriously affect the defense for abortion rights since Rowland is being accused of killing her unborn baby. Sounds rather familiar doesn't it? The pro-choice message is not only wicked, it's also illogical.
PETA Shows How Evil they Truly Are Here in Seattle, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is notorious for taking every opportunity they get to indoctrinate the minds of children. Today they waited for school to end outside a local middle school here in Seattle and greeted exiting students with signs that said "just say no to meat" and handed out fliers talking about meat pimps and meat addicts. The whole purpose of their message was "eating meat is like drug addiction". In addition, they handed out pens made to look like syringes wih red ink symbolizing animal blood. The whole heroine/meat comparison is just low. The principal was not happy, charging them with being racially insensitive to the high population of African American and Hispanic students at the school. Forget that. This is not an issue of racial insensitivity. PETA crossed the line when they tried to assert themselves over the rights of the parents of these children. If my child came home with PETA pamphlets, I'd be LIVID. In spite of the principal's wishes, PETA, not doing anything illegal, refused to stop. Last year they handed out fliers to kids saying, "Your Mommy Kills Animals". Funny, if those fliers said, "Jesus is Lord, repent and be baptized" the ACLU would be on the case. Somehow, PETA gets away with murder even though they're against it. This organization is blatantly corrupt and psychotic. It's a religion and they push their agenda on kids for a reason. Somebody's got to touch this generation and if we don't, PETA, NAMBLA, GLAAD, and Planned Parenthood will.
Britney Spears' New Show Too Racy Tonight Britney Spears was in Seattle for a concert and parents are outraged over the graphic nature of her concert. Apparently, she simulates sex acts and takes it too far. I suppose "too far" is relative right? Britney's latest CD boats songs about sexual promiscuity and masturbation, but simulating a sex act on stage, now that's taking it too far. Now parents are calling for concerts to have different ratings. This is ridiculous. I have a couple of thoughts on this matter.- Britney Spears hides behind smoke, sex, fancy outfits, sets and dancers because she does not have the vocal ability or talent to carry the stardom she's achieved by faking it.
- Any parent who sent their 13 year old daughter to a Britney Spears concert expecting a clean show is in serious denile.
- Any parent who allows their child to listen to a girl sing about masturbation and sexual liberty shouldn't have expected anything different from her concert.
- The ratings system in our society is a joke.
- Ratings and Parental Advisory Warnings were created for parents who don't want to do their job.
Okay, enough doom and gloom. God is doing fantastic things on the Earth. Although it seems I sometimes critique the negative aspects of our culture, these are the very same things that get me excited about the work of God. What an awesome opportunity we have as believers to make God's presence known in these above areas. Oh how we need it!
posted by ambra at 3/13/2004 01:33:43 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/12/2004
The "Image" of Black Americans As Told by the NAACP
Last night, clearly having lost my mind, I tuned into the re-run of the NAACP Image Awards. I'm not sure what I was thinking, but in my defense, I happened to be previously watching that channel, took a phone call, got distracted, and when I came back it was on, and like a zombie, I watched. Props to blogcritics.org, who have published a much beter re-cap than I could've including pre-awards show controversy over the nomination of R. Kelly. Apparently, Kwesi Mfume now believes that future nominations of entertainers warrant a moral standard. Shouldn't every nomination? Project 21's Mychal Massie was pleased with this decision. Although it may seem the NAACP was "out of touch" in their nomination, part of me can't help but think this was all a sick ploy for ratings. But what isn't these days?
Some noted observations and un-highlights of the night: Singer Beyonce was chosen as the "Entertainer of the Year", an award which clearly must be based on record sales and beauty alone. In introducing the awardee, actress and comidenne 'Monique lauded Beyonce's "booty-shakin'" song "Crazy in Love" and joked about how the song made her want to shake her backside in church. Most definately in poor taste if you ask me. Beyonce's acceptance speech made it clear that there was no depth to her music nor did she even seem convinced she should've been up there in the first place. She was right to feel that way. I'm not sure if I was more disgusted by Beyonce being recognized for her scantily clad image or Queen Latifah being awarded a best actress award for her work in the film Bringing Down 'Da House?! There is nothing more to be said. The NAACP has officially gone off the deep end. Keep in mind, the criterea for awards given is, "...projects and individuals who have demonstrated exemplary works by and for people of color". The NAACP has certainly re-defined "exemplary".
Then comes the God section. All African-American awards show have one as we have a rich spititual heritage and find it necessary to incorporate God into all that we do. I long for the day when we stop "incorporating" and start "serving". So the so-called "Gospel Movie" The Fighting Temptations (an MTV movie by the way) won for best film. I could have predicted that since black people have a propensity to rally behind most things that have to do with God, the Church, or Gospel Music. The trouble is, we usually don't have the discernment to recognize the real from the fake. Case and point: "Rev." Al Sharpton. Growing up, we used to joke about how anyone who ever sang gospel music at the Apollo never got "booed" off the stage.
In tribute to awardee Bishop TD Jakes of the mega-church "The Potters House" in Texas, Donnie McClurkin (one of my favorites) and Yolanda Adams sang a beautiful tribute, followed by Kirk Franklin running around the stage and yelling (never singing) as usual with his choir One Nation Crew. They sang "Hosanna", a great song and what would the NAACP be without a great gospel song? So of course the audience is on their feet, clapping and singing, many not even fully convinced of the words they speak, "Hosanna forever we worship you". The camera caught Cuba Gooding, Jr. clapping off-beat (I knew something wasn't right about that boy). That was a good moment. T.D. Jakes had some good words, but nothing he could've said could rescue the train wreck that had just taken place on that stage. It was a disturbing night.
LaShawn Barber posted some good insight a few days ago about the NAACP needing to be extinct. The Image Awards only further proves that point. We are in desparate need to re-define as a society what we believe to be a "good image"; especially African-Americans. God help us all.
posted by ambra at 3/12/2004 11:07:11 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/11/2004
Spike Lee Confuses Again
Notorious for making films with a messy message, Spike Lee is at it again. This time he's tapping into homosexuality to pull a plot for his newest film, "She Hate Me". In this comedy, "A Harvard-educated biotech executive (Anthony Mackie) is fired after exposing his bosses' corrupt business practices. According to Variety, he then begins to support himself by 'impregnating high-powered lesbians'." Lee claims his goal in making the film is to, "talk about the moral ethic in this country, and how money is God". In short, the fired executive plans an extensive money-making scheme in which he charges thousands of dollars to lesbians hoping to get pregnant. Great way to get your message across Spike and support the homosexual agenda at the same time! Either gays will be incensed and cry bloody murder over this portrayal, or they'll hop on the bandwagon and find a way to incorporate in it their right to get married. Then again, being that Lee has no real pull or influence in the media, they may just ignore him like much of America already does.
Like much of Spike Lee's work, this film has disaster written all over it. Although it is clear, Lee has staked out his spot of controversy on the Hollywood lawn. He wears the badge rather well; almost to the point of arrogance. I sometimes wonder if he's even able to take constructive criticism anymore. The whole "forget them" mentality seems to permeate his messages. Arrogance must've got the best of him last year because Lee sued Viacom, the company behind "Spike TV" claiming it was an attempt to associate the channel with himself for commercial gain. Spike, Please. If you hadn't noticed, Spike TV is up and running in spite of that presumptuous claim.
It is unfortunate however, that someone with such a brilliant cinematic mind wastes his efforts on mindless drivel and convoluted mixed messages. I think that given the right conviction, Spike Lee has the potential to be a powerful filmmaker. After all, the gifts of God are without repentance. "She Hate Me" is scheduled for release in July of this year. I can only pray it dies a miserable death at the box office.
posted by ambra at 3/11/2004 10:34:15 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/10/2004
This is Is It!
So the romance in me had its fix today. I think I may have found the most romantic and well-planned engagement story yet. And so cleverly and stylishly documented! See it here
Note: Link fixed
posted by ambra at 3/10/2004 06:21:07 PM | link to this entry |
|
My Trouble With Donating Blood
Today I arrived at my office to find an inter-office email titled "Blood Drive Today". My company holds them about three times a year and I never participate. My church holds them semi-annually as well. I don't participate in those either. At this point, 75% of those reading this think I'm a worthless and wretched miscreant. I probably am. But I certainly can't be any more horrible than the indignant hecklers who insist on coercing me into bodily fluid transmit by making me feel like a terrible human being because I don't want to give my own blood. I don't mind needles and I don't mind being asked one million questions about my medical history, nor have I traveled to any of the particular African countries named. I am just somewhat troubled about the notion of giving what I feel is a very important substance to complete strangers. And how can I trust what will really be done with it? Conspiracy theorists unite! I consider myself to be a steward over my resources, which includes my body, my organs, and all other substances therein. It's more of a personal conviction I suppose. I understand the medical importance of blood donors and I salute you all. Really I do. You're fantastic.
See, almost three years ago, on September 11, a very sobering and sad event took place in our nation. Over those next couple days, it was clear the country was in the midst of a crisis. People were frantic, people were dying, people were questioning, people were spiritually open and perhaps the most disturbing moment of all was a comment I heard from an anchor broadcast on the national news in the wake of the tragedy, "At this point there is nothing we Americans can do except give blood". What!? That's it? give blood? That is the answer? What a sad declaration of the state of our nation. Soon after, I watched and read news as hundreds and thousands of Americans lined up outside Red Crosses' across the country, donating blood to appease their moral consciences. I myself even considered it, although I thought the act of giving blood in such a hap-hazard way may not reap the best results. In fact, much of the blood that was donated could not be used due to contamination among other things. That didn't bother me so much. What bothered me was the perceived mark of "virtuosity" on the foreheads of all who had donated. It was as if they had done their part. Their moral duty was fulfilled. Now they could rest easy. As if blood was the only thing people needed? Part of me couldn't help thinking, "this is not going to save the world, let alone their souls". Yet, reason one on the American Red Cross website for why you should be a blood donor is, "It's the right thing to do".
Understand, I'm neither condemning blood drives nor the people they serve. I do feel however, there has been a gross mis-appropriation of the entire concept. It seems we have relegated health solutions to donating blood, passing out condoms, HIV/AIDS testing, free birth control, "cure for cancer" marathons, and informational pamphlets. Meanwhile, our collective focus has shifted from the only one who can cure, heal, deliver, and set free to our socially programmed "busy-ness" and non-profit organizations -- many of which, are merely the work of man and serve as a means to appease our own consciences. I often wonder is this really how God intended us to serve the sick? Every time a blood drive rolls around, I feel this strange sense of "civic-duty arrogance" in the atmosphere. I only hope that we do not treat these things as a means to an end. No amount of blood donations can solve the real human issue at stake.
posted by ambra at 3/10/2004 12:16:20 PM | link to this entry |
|
UPN Goes Righteous on Us
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. UPN tells producers of its latest cartoon series Game Over, which premieres tonight, to take out the language and nudity in its yet to be aired pilot episode. This is most likely a derivative from the CBS nipple stunt. If you've been able to stomach three minutes of any of UPN's sitcoms it was probably clear the network is a joke. Who is UPN kidding? They're arguably one of the most raunchy and least-respected networks around. As poor judgment would have it, three of the stars of UPN's show Girlfriends a black version of Sex and the City, where the women prove just how ho-ish they can be, will be hosting this year's NAACP Image Awards. Yeah the "image awards". The same awards show that has nominated R. Kelly, walking pedophile, for one of their "Image Awards" given to entertainers. If UPN wants to clean up their act, they need to yank about 75% of their programming off the air. That would be a start at least. Then again, UPN is owned by Viacom, who I could assume doesn't give a care about the continued declining portrayal of African-Americans on their network. It seems "we" don't care much either. We watch it, write it, produce it, and star in it. UPN is the BET of primetime television.
posted by ambra at 3/10/2004 09:37:18 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/9/2004
Guilty As Charged
Today I faced my accusers in a pre-trial hearing. I was fairly confident when I heard my name called by the Chief Magistrate. I was being summoned to state my case for why I didn't deserve to pay the whopping $38 parking ticket the City of Seattle was demanding me. So yes okay I'll admit, I did have somewhat of a bad attitude since I'd taken an hour and a half out of my work day and hiked all 15 blocks downtown to the courthouse with heels on, in the rain. When I got there I had to check-in with the clerk and fill out some preliminary paperwork. Then I was asked to sit in the waiting room with about 6 or 7 other equally ticked-off citizens. There was a tangible sense of irritation in the room. People were shuffling through pictures they'd taken of the scene of the crime, trying to decide on the best ones to convince the magistrate of their innocence. I sat in my seat righteously convinced that today was my day of vindication. So when they called my name, I happily gathered my things and headed into the magistrate's office to face my accusers.
Magistrate: Good morning, how are you today. (No question mark, it was rhetorical. He didn't really care) Me: Good morning, and I'm fine thank you. (he could've cut the formal salutations at that point, I was about the business) Magistrate: So according to this document, you're here today because you were parked... Me: in an unmarked crosswalk Sir. Magistrate: Yes that's what it says here. So can you please state your reasons for contesting the ticket? Me: First of all, I'd like to know what exactly an un-marked crosswalk IS??? Magistrate: An unmarked crosswalk is... Me: Before you start, I have some pictures of the scene. (hands magistrate pictures) Magistrate: (points at pictures) This is an unmarked crosswalk right here. Me: ::perplexed look:: This is a residential street. It's a neighborhood. People park here all day every day and somehow manage not to get tickets. Magistrate: It doesn't matter. It's against the law to park in an un-marked crosswalk (draws lines on a piece of paper showing where unmarked crosswalks exist) Me: (ignores drawing) We all live in this neighborhood, these so-called "un-marked crosswalks" are right in front of homes. So you're telling me that these people can get a ticket for parking outside their own house? Magistrate: Yes. Just like if they parked in front of a fire hydrant. Me: This is not a fire hydrant, it's an invisible crosswalk. Magistrate: It doesn't matter. Me: That is ludicrous. Magistrate: (shrugs shoulder) It is the law. If you would like to schedule a court date to contest it and have the officer (code for evil meter maid) testify, I can set that up right now. Me: That would only be a further waste of my time so no thank you. Magistrate: ashshsettrjtrtoetoselldlleppetgdjgsdssbfhdhdx Me: (no longer listening to Mr. Magistrate) I'm sorry, can you say that again? Magistrate: At this time you owe $38. You can pay that on the first floor, at window 10. Me: Today? Magistrate: Yes today. Me: I don't think so. I am not paying $38 today. I've already been inconvenienced enough. I'm leaving. Magistrate: Fine then, please go to the first floor and notify them when you will be paying $38 at window 12
(Dream Sequence in Slow Motion) Assuming superhuman strength, Ambra lunges forward and reaches over the desk to grab the neck of the magistrate. She simultaneously proceeds to kick the glass out of the window with her now, very well treaded high heel boots. Using one hand, she dangles the Chief Magistrate out of the window 18 stories up over moving traffic below. He begs for mercy, and promises to pardon Ambra of the $38 ticket. He admits the law is faulty and promises to expose all the wickedness on the city council if she lets him come back inside. Ambra makes him promise to pardon the fees due all the other people in the waiting room first. He says he'll do it and she slowly brings him inside and releases him from her death grip. A party breaks out in the court waiting room. Crowds chant, "Hail, Hail" as leaves the magistrates office. The mayor starts crying, the meter maids repent, the band starts playing "We Are the Champions". (Dream Sequence Ends)
Me: I will do just that. Thanks and have a nice day. (I had to buy myself some time since I plan on paying the ticket in pennies)
posted by ambra at 3/9/2004 11:16:57 PM | link to this entry |
|
The Passion III
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but I came across some really excellent scriptual insight from a local pastor here in Washington on how we ought to address issues raised by the movie. Thus ends my triology.
posted by ambra at 3/9/2004 07:40:08 PM | link to this entry |
|
Jimmie Hatz: the Urban Condom
This story is one that's been in the media for quite some time. The beginning of 2004 marked the somewhat anticipated release of new "Hip-Hop" condoms called "Jimmie Hatz". So you're wondering if the condoms play music when you open them, or if they include a secret code by which you can secure tickets to the next Chingy concert, or maybe they give you some tips on writing a really good rhyme. No, in fact the only thing different or "Hip-Hop" about these condoms is the packaging; a shiny rapper with a cartoon picture of a pit-bull or rottweiller sporting a gold "Mr. T. starter kit" chain immediately lets you know the company behind these condoms is after a certain market: urban youth and namely, young people of color. I suppose it was only a matter of time since hip-hop, top-selling musical form, has already infiltrated the commercial industry. It is a proven fact that hip-hop sells and where there's money to made, usually the weasels are hot on the trail.
According to Harry Terrell, CEO of the company behind Jimmie Hatz, "Basically, what we've tried to do here is make it the cool thing to do, the 'in' thing to do, to protect yourself." That is cow dung. Mr. Terrell's statement alone should be a red flag to anyone who has the good sense God gave them. The evangelical outpost posted a good article a month or so back on the condom conspiracy--the great lie that condoms are the best form of protection, the ideology that teenagers do not nor cannot have self-control. They are just these rabid beasts succumbing to the whims of their flesh so we might as well slap a condom on them in hopes that they won't get somebody pregnant or contract HIV. It always amazes me that people forget that there are huge corporations making an inordinate amount of money by pushing out condoms to the masses. This is not Social Concern 101. This is Economics 600. There is a lot of money to be made in the condom industry and don't be fooled into thinking Harry Terrell, Trojan, or any other company is even the least bit concerned about abstinence education or the HIV problem among "urban youth". Although Mr. Terrell would say, "It's a full blown effort on our part to save our community". I assume Mr. Terrell's goal is help our community by giving young people a means to continue to seek false gratification by filling up their emptiness with pre-mature intercourse, lengthening the list of their sexual soul-ties, and inevitably adding to the number of un-wed mothers, young fathers, and further continuing the cycle of poverty in many urban communities. This is far worse than the effects of pop (or for you east coasters "soda") machines in elementary schools. There is a sound of truth that needs to resound on this issue. These condoms are the last thing hip-hop needs, more importantly they're the last thing my generation needs. Mr. Terrell needs to be called to the carpet on his actions. So where's the NAACP now? As usual, nowhere to be found.
Other related stories on "Jimmie Hatz": "Hip-Hop Condoms to hit stores" - CNN "Hip-Hop Condoms to hit stores next year" - BET (the always credible) "The 'rap'-per makes a difference" - Pittsburgh Courier JimmieHatz.com - where the company offers statistics to support their social cause.
posted by ambra at 3/9/2004 09:59:39 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/8/2004
Grooming Conservative Leaders
Patrick Henry College, a newer evangelical 4 year institution focused on training home-schooled students is being charged with one of the worst crimes to date: raising too many conservative leaders. According to David Kirkpatrick of the New York times, seven of the White House's 100 interns were pulled from the school's 240 student enrollment and one works for the Bush re-election campaign. Apparently that's one too many in the eyes of the political left. According to a woman interviewed for the article (who happens to be the education policy director for a liberal advocacy group), "The number of Patrick Henry interns in the White House scares me to death." It's a travesty I'm sure. I do realize how scary that word "evangelical" is in the name of an academic institution. I think my dear and very Christian parents nearly had hernias when I told them I was considering transferring to Oral Roberts University three years ago. It is interesting how something like this even warrants media attention. This is how colleges should be--specialized. Every university is seeking to be have a mark on its student population. Have you seen the glossy layouts for college brochures these days? You'd think you were being sold a timeshare. Yet, while it is scary to many that such a small school would push out such a large percentage of leaders of a certain thought persuasion, I can name off 10 universities and colleges right now (my former university included) that are responsible for consistently producing some of the most liberal, God-hating, morally relative leaders of the 21st century. Here's a hint, most of them are in the New-England area. Now that's scary.
The charge against the school's president is a charge that can be made against just about any president of a university, provided he or she is not a tool of the alumni or Board of Directors. Institutions of higher education want the reputation of raising up leaders provided you think the way they want you to think. I used to work in my university's annual fund office, I know how dirty the fundraising campaigns can get. It is unfortunate however, that because this school is a proponent of conservative thought, the opportunists cry, "Conspiracy!" I say it is time for education reform in America and that means universities as well. I say kudos to a a small school gaining a reputation of integrity in their students.
posted by ambra at 3/8/2004 11:11:03 AM | link to this entry |
|
3/7/2004
Weekend Re-cap
That thing called the flesh caugh up with me this week hence the four going on five days postless. If I was one of the X-men, I'd want my super power to be the ability to go days without sleeping. Unfortunately, I don't have that gift and the pillow and I have done some much needed bonding this week. So much so that I missed some great turning points in the state America. I jest.
John Edwards Bows Out of the Race But when will Al Sharpton? He is such a joke of Reverend it's not even funny. So it is clear that John Kerry will get the Democratic nomination. But will he beat Bush? Absolutely not. There are even some Democrats who will be voting for Bush. Kerry's just no contest lest, Pat Robertson should shame the name of God. (smile)
Omarosa gets fired by "the Donald" on the Apprentice Just goes to show, don't piss off your teammates, and don't be a rude jerk all the time. I still stand on my previous thoughts regarding her being a victim of clever editing. But it was her time to go. The exposure she's received in all this is a much better reward than getting locked into a fishy deal to run one of Donald's companies. Somebody's going to be the "Clay Aiken" of this competition.
Martha Stewart, Guilty on All Counts Well Hot Dog! I stand corrected. Now let's see what happens from here. Sad to say, above all the insider trading stuff, there is a principle of sowing and reaping at work here. Martha wasn't guilty of lying about what she did (okay maybe yes), but the truth of the matter is, she was guilty of being a first-class jerk. There is nothing that she did that hasn't been done numerous times by other CEO's. That doesn't necessarily make it right, but it certainly seems unfair for her to be called to the carpet right? Absolutely not. It has long been known that the person of Martha Stewart is shrewd, rude, and downright belligerant. Up until now, no one could argue that her method of rising to the top (crushing the heads of those under and around her) was wrong. Unfortunately, the sow/reap principle applies to everyone and Martha is getting her due.
Passion Still Tops Box Office "Shakin' the haters off", Gibson's movie remains number one and even suprises analysts to only slip 39% in box office sales in its second week. That is unheard of in the industry. Don't doubt, Hollywood is angry. Production and distribution companies that turned this offer down are wallowing in self-pity right about now. It is inevitable that self-pity will turn into conniving back-stabbing. So be it. You can't deny he brilliancy of it all. The Bible is the top selling book of all time.
posted by ambra at 3/7/2004 08:42:50 PM | link to this entry |
|
The Passion II
Well, I finally did it. I saw the Passion and I must say, it feels good to be able to have an opinion based on something tangible. Never in my life have I seen a movie theater so captivated by a movie. There were times when you could literally hear a pin drop. Even the foul-mouthed heckler sitting next to us felt so convicted, he had to shut up half way through the movie. I will probably never see this movie again, but I am so glad I did. I actually had to physically make myself watch the gruesome parts and even then, I knew they weren't as gruesome as they should've or could've been. The reports that the movie was too gory just don't hold much weight for me after experiencing it with my own eyes. And I myself am one of the most squeemish people you will ever meet. In my most humble and personal opinion, the film exceeded my expectations. There is the looming sense of Catholicism in the focus on Mary among other things, but I expected that from Gibson. All my other issues with the movie can be squashed for the sake of furthering the Gospel. Many have argued that Gibson needed to tell more of the story, I say he achieved his purpose of wanting to capture the feeling of those last 12 hours with the focus on Jesus. I stayed until the end of the credits -- not because I was trying to be deep, but because I felt that pulling off a film such as what I'd viewed had to have been a mighty endeavor, and I wanted to honor and respect the work it took.
There is something happening in the spiritual atmosphere. People will argue whether or not Gibson really heard from God to make this movie. That is not really the issue in my opinion and I don't presume to know. I only hope Gibson himself comes to receive true Salvation through this process. The real question we need to be asking is where is God at work right now? And where can we join Him in His work? It is no mistake that only days leading up to the premiere of the Passion the homosexual "marriage" controversy hit the media like a bomb. And let's not be mistaken, mass media would have you think same-sex "marriages" are taking place in every crevice of the universe. It's a lie and it just goes to show how much power they have over the media. The reality, is, compared to the millions of people that live in America, only about 7-9,000 people are participating in this gay "marriage" debacle. It is a distraction. The majority of American citizens are not for gay "marriage" and we're pretty dense to think otherwise. Even John Kerry can't bring himself to call the union of two men a "marriage". We need to call things out for what they are and this debate is a dissipation. We need to give a clear answer to all the issues being raised and we must be strategic, but we cannot allow the lie of this issue to dominate the airwaves nor our lives.
Personally, if I wasn't a believer, I wouldn't see the Passion. God makes us accountable for everything we've heard, everything we know, and everything we've seen--especially the Gospel. It has been argued that the Passion is not a real presentation of the Gospel. I'd say it's pretty darn close. The Gospel is simple. The finished work of Christ can be understood even by a child. Christ made it simple for us through His sinless life. Entering the Kingdom of God and "working out our salvation" as the Bible declares, is where the real work begins. There is a certain doorway that has been kicked open by this film. I'm not sure what the doorway is, but when I find out, I'll post it in an instant. Those who have eyes to see will recognize that if God can use a rock and if he can use our unworthy piles of flesh, he can use anything, no matter how much we Christians may oppose it.
posted by ambra at 3/7/2004 07:37:36 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/3/2004
Reader Email
Now isn't this interesting? I received this from a reader among others in response to that last post:
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:56:46 -0800 From: Patrick To: ambra@nykola.com Subject: amazing
When I started to read this I got the stereotypical "knee jerk" liberal reaction being the hard core democrat that I am and became angry until I kept reading and realized that this was so "spot on" it was scary. I too am so sick of the fact that all we do is talk in this country without ever really doing anything. We whine, b**** and moan on TV, in letters to newspapers & magazines and on our blogs because it is so much easier than actually doing anything while people from other countries, as you stated, come here and work their a**s off to attain as much success as they can. Unfortunately since we have it so good we are spoiled and that is never good for one's character and/or work ethic.
Thanks, Patrick
posted by ambra at 3/3/2004 01:57:58 PM | link to this entry |
|
Posted Elsewhere
This is a post I wrote that was published on another blogger's site (apparently he liked it, even though it was directed towards him) I won't link to the site as I can't endorse the content. Anyway, it was a response to a rant he wrote on Freedom of Speech, the Clear Channel/Howard Stern Controversy, and how much he hates President Bush and his whole administration. I was not impressed:
[I wrote:]Cry me a river. Conservative morality is being shoved down peoples throats? Hardly compares to the Liberal agenda shoved down most peoples' throats when they turn on most major television networks, go to public school, or try to watch a movie.
The point is, LOTS of stuff is being shoved down people's throats from all different directions. No single political party is wielding the sword here. You better believe that Democrats are strategic if not more so at getting their message across in convoluted ways. Political parties are just evil. All 100 of them. No good can come from "group think". [Note: when they're thinking the wrong things!]
Stop all the whining and just be thankful you can actually make a choice politically. There's always someone worse off than you. It's easier for us to feel better about our own lack of productivity by blaming everything on the big bad government. Americans make me sick. Myself included. (Yes that's right, I make myself sick). We're so lazy, but we can somehow manage to post on our blogs how much we hate the government [in his case, it was the Bush Administation] or how disenfranchised we are. Meanwhile, the average immigrant can come here and make twice as much money as we do, own 6 businesses, and manage to raise their kids to replicate the process. Why? Because they recognize that authority is authority and they can whine and moan but it's not going to change their situation. They actually DO something in spite of the government. So I say, we're full of excuses and I think it's a load of crap. People need to step outside of themselves. How does what we do as individuals impact the same issues we complain about. In spite of our problems, we're freakin' blessed to live in a country like America and that shouldn't be forgotten. Whoever catches that revelation will be the most successful in life. Period.
posted by ambra at 3/3/2004 12:37:50 PM | link to this entry |
|
3/1/2004
10 Things I Learned from the Democratic Presidential Candidate Debate
I indulged myself in the recent Democratic candidate debate aired on C-SPAN. Again, I remind readers that I have never sought out to be a political pundit here. I leave that to real buffs. I just call 'em like I see 'em. So I give you, politics for the people. These are some things I learned by watching the debate:
- Dan Rather is realy really old. When did this happen? He is also rather funny looking. I never noticed how much his ears stick out. Who knew time could do that to you.
- America will never vote someone with the title "Rev." into office.
- Congressman Dennis Kucinich looks like he's made of plastic. I wonder if his politics are plastic as well.
- It's absolutely not cool for a presidential candidate to not believe in God. So make sure you convince the viewers that you actually believe in Him. Contrary to popular belief, God's pretty important to a lot of Americans. It helps if you know some scriptures as well.
- This whole gay marriage thing has people confused. Even the candidates aren't sure what they think about it.
- When in doubt, blame it on George W. Bush.
- Sen. John Edwards must have a Master's degree in "Brown Nosing"
- It is important to wear the presidential candidate uniform: Navy Blue Suit, White Shirt, Power Tie.
- It's all about getting in the last word. Also, you look a lot better if you can throw in some policy jargon. Even if you're not sure what you're talking about, just make stuff up.
- Al Sharpton may potentially have ADD. Oh wait, that's a made up disease. Well then he's just impatient.
posted by ambra at 3/1/2004 10:51:35 PM | link to this entry |
|
Week-end Re-cap
Today, Monday hit me like a semi-truck. I was so not prepared to wake up this morning. Especially after a rather mentally draining "family meeting" we had last night. I remember on the Cosby show they had family forums. What took place last night was similar to that. We all went around the table and said how we felt about a particular issue I'm not at liberty to discuss on the world-wide web. In the midst of the meeting, I kept thinking, "this is so 1986 Cosby Show cheesy". I always wanted to be a Huxtable. Last night I got my chance. Side note: While reading the paper on the way to work (via bus, not while driving), I read an ad for the "Second Annual Save-the-Turtles Silent Auction". Seattle in a nutshell. What is wrong with these people?
Bush Loses Support of Gay Republicans I don't think this is something George should be concerned about. It would make perfect sense. According to the article, which is of course slanted in view and probably not credible, they feel "betrayed" by the President's recommendations concerning the constitutional amendment. They were entertaining illusions of grandeur if they really thought the President would be pro-gay marriage, constitutional amendment or not.
The State of the Black Family On Saturday night I had the not-so-privilege of watching a forum held on CSPAN called "The State of the Black Family". It was a Tavis Smiley presents deal that included a panel of smarties, Ph.d's, authors and whatnot. It also included a few notable African American achievers like Dr. Ben Carson famous neurosurgeon as well as not so noted, flaky, fake-Christian spiritist Iyanla Vanzant (who knew she was still around?). Many remember her from a stint on Oprah; then she got her own show but who doesn't after being on Oprah? I guess she was just no Dr. Phil because her show was cancelled rather quickly. We should all thank the network for that. Now she runs her own company "Inner Visions". That name itself is a warning sign to stay far away. So in any case, I'm sitting there watching this symposium with my usual cynical, critical eye, trying to be as open-minded as possible. Well, I tried. At least Cornel West was in the audience and not on the panel this time. His rhetoric drives me crazy.
I will admit, there was some good stuff said all around (education reform, rebuilding communities, getting fathers back into position, understanding the hip hop generation, yadda yadda ya). But overwhelmingly, it was nothing more than a bunch of intellectual smarty-pants sitting up there trying to out-intellectualize each other. A telling moment: one viewer emailed in a question concerning the current gay-marriage debate wondering what were the thoughts of all the panelists on the subject. Never in my life have I seen so much talking around the issue. After a good 30-45 minutes spent intellectualizing theory, no one was able to give a clear answer. I was so sickened by that. Most of these people either had no idea what they believed, or they were too afraid their book sales would go down by being labeled "conservative" for saying how they really felt. For goodness's sake, take a stand one way or another. At least don't talk in circles. I have more respect for people who will put their conviction right on out there.
The Passion Scores at the Box Office Hollywood changes its tune. At first people we're calling Mel Gibson's demise. Now they're saying otherwise. They are some of the most fickle people I tell you. I'm willing to take all bets, and I promise you, the next year or so will give birth to a couple of spin-offs and/or other Biblical stories being brought to the bigscreen not necessarily at the hands of Mr. Gibson but somebody's going to run with this. For the most part, Hollywood is all about green. I still haven't seen the movie yet, but I will say, there is something to be noted in the fact that Mel used his own money primarily to finance his vision in spite of skeptics and now even many of the skeptics are changing their tune. He will be reaping some financial benefits here. That will inevitably bother Christians. Well, we're fickle too.
posted by ambra at 3/1/2004 02:12:52 PM | link to this entry |
|
Apparently, I am Part of an Alien Race
I'm not sure if I should take this as a compliment or just laugh. I have just been called the farthest-right conservative this person's ever seen. Wow, they need to get out more eh? So of course, I can't help but be sarcastic in my response.
posted by ambra at 3/1/2004 09:24:10 AM | link to this entry |
|
|
|
|