Did Three 6 Mafia really run around the stage of the Academy Awards ceremony yelling about how hard it is to be a pimp? Artistic enterprise my pinky toe (which is broken, by the way). On behalf of Hattie McDaniel and Sidney Poitier, I am embarrassed--for the award, for the display, and ultimately the representation. I don't know what to say. Although it certainly does my heart well to know that despite the glorification of pimping, at the very least, Jesus was thanked. And I'm sure somewhere in celebritydom, Kanye Mess heard that acceptance speech and was under the impression that Three 6 Mafia was actually thanking him. For the Mafia's sake, I certainly hope that was the case. Because nothing in my mind can comprehend what hand Jesus Christ had in that mess.
For the record, I'm over the Oscars. (Can't you tell?) Is it possible for an awards ceremony to jump the shark? Honestly, I would rather have the hairs individually plucked from my legs than spend four hours listening to Jon Stewart host anything, let alone an already notoriously monotonous awards show. At least plucking my legs would supply me with some sort of productive end-result. And yes I realize that illustration is a bit disgusting, but that's just my point. I would rather be disgusted than be super duperly disgusted. Yet despite my disgust, I consider it a small victory that the "Academy" had enough sense not to give the makers of Brokeback Mountain another chip of evidence in their mounting convictions that they actually produced a worthwhile film.
Is there coming a day when we finally unburden ourselves with the delusion that being intentionally random, abstract, irrelevant and morally "cutting-edge" are the key ingredients for greatness?
The inadequacies of the modern film aside, the Oscars never fail to leave me disturbed on some gigantic level. Perhaps I need to lower my expectations. However, given the emphasis on the Oscars and the fact that the future of film is directly influenced by this event, I tend to take it more seriously.
I love Terrence Howard, but the fact that his first Oscar nomination is for a role as a pimp really bothers me. Not to knock Howard's performance; he's a fine actor in his own right. Yet unlike Halle Berry, he didn't win the Oscar. For that I am abundantly thankful. I am thankful that we didn't have to listen to Howard sob through an acceptance speech, dedicating it to honorable historical black figures and rambling on about how his Oscar is for every nameless and faceless man of color that now has an opportunity because he epitomized a pimp.
Now before I am accused of partaking of the cup of hateration, understand that I believe Howard will eventually win an Oscar and I'd rather his accolade not immortalize him for characterizing the most egregious of behaviors. Quite frankly, the black community can't afford that.
Why much of the black community continues to remain passive towards the glorification of pimpdom is an entirely different and more complicated topic. But what I found to be terribly ironic Sunday night was what one cultural definition of the verb "to pimp" reveals:
Pimp (verb)
1. To make something appear better than it really is by adorning it with various emblems and pricey status symbols of the culture (see "ghettofabulous")
2. To advertise (generally, in an enthusiastic sense) or to call attention in order to bring acclaim to something; to promote.
So it seems that in a shocking turn of events, "Pimping" is actually being
pimped.
It all seems easy enough to me.
Posted by:
nick at March 7, 2006 4:54 AM
Posted by:
Steven J. Kelso Sr. at March 7, 2006 7:56 AM
Posted by:
Steven J. Kelso Sr. at March 7, 2006 8:00 AM
Posted by: Joyce Williamson at March 7, 2006 8:34 AM
Posted by: CD at March 7, 2006 10:12 AM
Posted by: Corey Smith at March 7, 2006 10:21 AM
Posted by: CD at March 7, 2006 12:53 PM
Posted by: Matt at March 7, 2006 6:01 PM
Posted by: BillyHW at March 7, 2006 8:58 PM
Posted by: 404momi at March 7, 2006 10:28 PM
Posted by: jouner at March 8, 2006 3:16 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at March 9, 2006 7:54 AM
Posted by:
neofundamental at March 9, 2006 8:25 AM
Posted by: Steve-O at March 9, 2006 2:20 PM
Posted by:
Susan L. Prince at March 10, 2006 9:05 AM
Posted by: Deuce at March 12, 2006 11:26 AM
Posted by: Rhonda at March 14, 2006 11:46 AM
Posted by: claire at March 16, 2006 8:02 AM
Check out Romans 1:21 in the same book. It comes real close to saying what you said.