The other day, a few friends and I got into a very interesting conversation about the cultural implications of this gut-wrenching new reality show called, "The Supernanny." For the record, don't watch it. Once was enough for me. Let me spare you the coronary I nearly had when I saw a 6-year-old boy cuss at his mother. Say what? Nothing makes me want to hurl my television into the Pacific Ocean more than seeing family dysfunction on primetime. Is it just me, or are 21st century children growing ruder by the second?
"The Supernanny," (in short) chronicles the life of a family with hellion misbehaving children as they become subject to the advice of an experienced British disciplinarian nanny-type. The show is not without the typical clever editing and musical underscore that tells you how to emote. By the end of the one-hour show, the parents are in awe of the results of fairly stand standard disciplinary principles employed by the "Supernanny," as if to say, "You mean when we discipline our children, it works?"
Why yes you fools. It does.
See I have this problem. I can't stand disrespectful children or the parents that raise them. When I'm in a store and I hear a non-mortgage-paying adolescent talk back rudely to their parent, I have to exit the premises. It makes me sick to my stomach. Call me a traditionalist, but I think young people should respect their elders--especially the elders that pay the electric bill and stand in line at the crack of dawn to buy overpriced basketball shoes. You know, the sneakers (or tennis shoes depending on region) that kids kill for.
It seems the last 20 years have given birth to a new breed of ungrateful offspring (myself included at times) that live life out of entitlement and lack proper appreciation.
When I was growing up, "What" was a bad word. When an adult called our names and we answered, "What?!" it was over. We were read our last rights and death soon followed. To this day, there are adults whose first names I still do not know because we always had to address them as "Mr." and "Mrs." And yet these days it's considered "cool" for kids to call their teachers "Bob" and "Chloe." I don't care how progressive we get, I do not foresee a day when I would address my parents by their first names.
For someone who's never been a parent, I've never lacked an opinion on child-rearing. Take my thoughts with a grain of something if you must. As the days go by, I am more convinced that almost 95% of our country's problems could be solved in the family. I've said it before and I'll say it again. We don't have crime problems; we have family problems. Family dysfunction spills into the streets, and eventually we pay for it with our tax dollars and more painfully--our time. Rarely do we make that glaring connection. Instead, we collectively throw our hands up in the air, wondering where our society went wrong.
Posted by:
Janna at April 7, 2005 6:46 AM
Posted by:
Teem at April 7, 2005 7:43 AM
Posted by: Julie at April 7, 2005 9:20 AM
Posted by:
Janna at April 7, 2005 9:38 AM
Posted by:
Kristen at April 7, 2005 10:40 AM
Posted by: Julie B. at April 7, 2005 11:22 AM
Posted by:
Ambra Nykol at April 7, 2005 11:41 AM
Posted by: Marc at April 7, 2005 11:47 AM
Posted by: Andrea at April 7, 2005 12:17 PM
Posted by: Andrea at April 7, 2005 12:18 PM
Posted by:
Ambra Nykol at April 7, 2005 12:29 PM
Posted by: Keith Harris at April 7, 2005 12:43 PM
Posted by:
James at April 7, 2005 4:37 PM
Posted by: Julie at April 7, 2005 5:09 PM
Posted by: Alex at April 7, 2005 5:40 PM
Posted by:
DarkStar at April 7, 2005 6:16 PM
Posted by: Deuce at April 7, 2005 7:18 PM
Posted by:
Jennifer at April 7, 2005 7:25 PM
Posted by: ron mexico at April 7, 2005 8:51 PM
Posted by: Julie B. at April 7, 2005 9:27 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at April 7, 2005 10:21 PM
Posted by: Anthony at April 8, 2005 7:47 AM
Posted by: Jen S at April 8, 2005 8:15 AM
Posted by:
Noelle at April 8, 2005 9:15 AM
Posted by:
christmasghost at April 8, 2005 12:10 PM
Posted by: Paul at April 8, 2005 1:12 PM
Posted by: Cath at April 8, 2005 4:27 PM
Posted by: Shawna at April 8, 2005 5:21 PM
Posted by: Rafael Daniel at April 10, 2005 5:40 AM
Posted by: stan at April 11, 2005 4:54 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at April 11, 2005 5:51 PM
Posted by: stan at April 11, 2005 7:24 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at April 11, 2005 7:51 PM
Posted by: Shawna at April 11, 2005 9:11 PM
Posted by: stan at April 12, 2005 12:03 PM
Posted by: Joni at April 12, 2005 6:59 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at April 12, 2005 7:03 PM
Posted by: Gina R Johnson at April 12, 2005 9:33 PM
Posted by: Tammy at May 27, 2005 9:34 PM
Hey... this reminds me of a show I caught on A&E the other day called "Intervention." They featured this one guy who was 31 years old and a compulsive gambler. I guess he allowed himself to be videotaped because he thought he was on a show about addiction, but it's really a show about intervention. Anyway, this guy was a piece.of.work!!! He acted just like those brat children on the Supernanny shows except he was THIRTY ONE years old! He, without shame, proclaimed that "it is the duty of the parents to take care of their children... FOR LIFE!" He truly expected his parents to fork out thousands of dollars to cover his horrendous gambling habits. When they tried to confront him and say no, he would freak out (i.e., throw a temper tantrum) and looked like he was at the point of physically harming them. His own parents! I couldn't believe it. He was the most inconsiderate and selfish pig of a human being. When they did the "intervention," he accused them of not being loyal and not "fulfilling their duties as parents"... thus the blame for his outrageous problems lied on everyone else but himself. In the end, he did agree to treatment IF his parents covered the 2 grand that he needed to get to the bank the next day. (Although he was $800,000 in debt.) I just couldn't believe it. Supernanny needs to come and kick this guy into reality. But this guy was psycho. It disgusted me to see him featured on TV too. Completely nuts.