In what appears to be the relentlessly fraudulent pursuit of relevancy (or whatever), many of our institutions of higher learning have abandoned the curriculum of yore and burdened themselves with the rebellious idea that anything can be turned into a learning experience.
I recall during my first and last year at Wesleyan University, the gates of the inferno manifested in our college curriculum. In that year, a class simply called "Pornography" sought to make some investigative headway into the industry, its literature, and its culture. And surprisingly enough, kids paid $36,000 a year in tuition to do so. I am certain picking up a video rental membership would've spared them a buck or two. The course, which caused a bit of outrage among endowment funding alumni, included elements of video, fiction, and photography. And like all things academic, they even had guest lecturers: porn stars. A Hartford Courant article reported:
"Porn stars now work the college lecture circuit. Performance artist Annie Sprinkle, who packed a Wesleyan auditorium Sunday, extolled the value of prostitution and told students, 'The answer to bad porn is not no porn, but to try to make better porn.'"
It's no wonder our college degrees are failing us with such repugnant refuse being espoused as intelligent. The culmination of the course was a final assignment whereby students were instructed by Professor Hope Weissman to "Just create your own pornography". My beloved school would've been better off just calling the class "Hedonism 101".
I began with this story because in more recent events, Syracuse University has decided to throw its hat in the ring of the battle between reason and stupidity. As much as it pains me to admit it, I think stupidity might be winning.
When you think of rapper Lil' Kim, you don't think of the word "class" (in either meaning of the noun). But according to CNN, Syracuse recently introducted a course titled, "Hip-Hop Eshu: Queen B**** 101 -- The Life and Times of Lil' Kim". According to instructor Greg Thomas, the course seeks "to look into things that gender studies have been trying to grapple with" and requires students to read Kim's song lyrics as literary texts and analyze her iconography in videos and performances. Move over Maya Angelou, there's a new poet in town. Kim has even made a guest appearance to speak to the class about her music. A better working title for this course would be "The New Misogyny: how women hate themselves".
Posted by:
Ethel at November 19, 2004 5:49 AM
Posted by:
Bijan at November 19, 2004 6:00 AM
Posted by: Alex at November 19, 2004 6:09 AM
Posted by:
Glen at November 19, 2004 7:37 AM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at November 19, 2004 7:52 AM
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at November 19, 2004 8:47 AM
Posted by: Gina R Johnson at November 19, 2004 9:09 AM
Posted by:
Jeremy Pierce at November 22, 2004 4:04 PM
Posted by: Johnnie D. at December 9, 2004 8:17 AM
Ummm, OK. I took a hip hop course at my school two years ago and it studied the various aspects and history of hip hop. I took the course as a part of my major (comparative media) and I was excited for this class. Women and mysogyny plays an important role in hip hop (this should NOT surprise you), whether you agree with it or not. I agree there are some conscious and better messages that one could study when it comes to hip hop. However, one would be remiss to completely ignore and disqualify the role mysogyny has played in the genre and culture. Furthermore, Kim being one of the biggest selling female rappers is extremely important to the culture. We may not like who she is or what she does, but you can't ignore her if you are going to take a qualitative look at hip hop. Granted, I'm not sure if she needs a whole class dedicated to her.....but then again hip hop is so very complex. I felt that in my class, my Lil Kim Week was a bit short, and gender roles in hip hop could have been explored more.
In the grand scheme of things--it's a college class, not a congressional hearing. Just because there is a college course on Lil Kim doesn't mean we are "glorifying" or "endorsing" the behavior. Just like taking a class on Communism isn't glorifying and endorsing it, but is just a study on it. Yeah there are better parts of hip hop to study. But if colleges only taught on the "good" parts of any subject, we would probably be more self-righteous than we already are as well as naive and misinformed. I can perhaps understand ones arguement against teaching hip hop in college period, but I don't understand one saying teach this part, but not this part. What would the world be like if we only learned one part of World history? Math? Philosophy? Physics? You've got to see the whole picture and don't be afraid to delve into speciailized areas because it has questionable content.
Perhaps some folks need to take a step back and really try to look into the history and culture of hip hop instead of just judging it on it's surface and its latest lyrics. Pick up a book by Tricia Rose.
" There's nothing profound about glorifying gang activity and filthy lifestyles. "
You'd be surprised.