Over the past couple of days, Democrat vampires have been giving themselves hernias over the recent suspicions that Alan Keyes' 19-year-old daughter, Maya Keyes is a lesbian. Nate Livingston of "Black Cincinnati Blog" seems to think that conservatives, especially black, Christian ones are hiding out on this issue,
For all their holier-than-thou lecturing to us common folks, our friendly neighborhood Christian conservatives seem mighty silent on the Maya Keyes situation. It's not just the white Christian bloggers who remain silent, everyday I read a number of blogs run by people who call themselves Black Christian conservatives but I have yet to read where one of them has called for Alan Keyes' to publicly comment on the scandal, encourage his daughter to fess up and sin no more, and take personal responsibility for his prior statements.
I assume the "prior statements" to which Livingston is referring would be those where Keyes called homosexuality an "abomination". Since the gauntlet is thrown, don't think I won't have something to say.
First of all, will the entirety of all the blogosphere please get a grip. For goodness' sake, Rathergate has sent the entire Left of the blogosphere running, trying to crack the next big story. The walls are not going to come crashing down on this one folks and I'll tell you why after I confirm the facts. Because I desire to be a "good journalist" (she says half-heartedly), it's worth nothing that everything up until this point is alleged.
Thus far, the abundance of speculation and reporting with regards to this story has taken place on the internet. The last few weeks of CBS scandal have confirmed that if ever there were a place for a story to be cracked, it'd be the internet.
The Democrat-worshipping Daily Kos, (which is by the way, now a "certified" Google news source, God help us all) reported today that a TV host on a local public television show "Chicago Tonight" covered the story on-air Wednesday evening. Other than that, mass media coverage has mostly been nilch. Perhaps most papers and news stations are smart enough to know you have to be careful when you're reporting on speculated information. Then again, that logic doesn't exactly hold up, not even for me. The NY Daily News picked up on it, as well as the ever-wholesome Wonkette, who managed to call Keyes a "rampant homophobe", one of the many words Anna Marie Cox uses incorrectly.
So here's the media's (and mostly Liberals') beef: they want Keyes to come out (for lack of a better phrase) with a statement on this whole situation. No doubt, there is ultimately hope that Keyes will be forced to back off from his harsh stance against the homosexual lifestyle. This is of course, the goal of those who support the "non-existent agenda"--to discredit those who are against them.
Posted by:
Joan at September 30, 2004 6:06 PM
Posted by:
DarkStar at September 30, 2004 7:45 PM
Posted by: jab at September 30, 2004 9:07 PM
Posted by: Ambra Nykol at September 30, 2004 10:18 PM
Posted by:
Glen at September 30, 2004 10:26 PM
Posted by: jab at September 30, 2004 10:37 PM
Posted by: sean mccray at October 1, 2004 2:10 AM
Posted by:
BH at October 1, 2004 7:28 AM
Posted by:
Diane R. at October 1, 2004 10:02 AM
Posted by:
Diane R. at October 1, 2004 10:07 AM
Posted by:
Samantha at October 1, 2004 11:02 AM
Posted by:
Nate at October 1, 2004 4:32 PM
Posted by: Alex at October 1, 2004 8:45 PM
Posted by:
Joan at October 1, 2004 11:06 PM
Posted by: Andy at October 4, 2004 2:21 AM
Posted by:
Ambra Nykol at October 4, 2004 12:59 PM
Posted by: Alex at October 4, 2004 3:22 PM
Posted by:
Umberto at October 5, 2004 5:36 AM
Posted by: JQu at October 6, 2004 10:16 PM
I know I'm going to get hammered for this, but here goes:
Keyes is smart not to say anything, and I doubt he ever will. His daughter is 19 years old. 19-year-olds are exactly the types to engage in lifestyle experimentation, including flirtations with homosexuality. No matter how vehemently she may say she's gay today, there's a significant chance that she won't be by the time she's 30.
I know anecdotal evidence is meaningless, but I have plenty of stories about girls who were gay in college who graduated and got married and had kids. Actually, and this could just be some weird coincidence, but of the 8 gay people I knew best in college, all but one of them is now happily married with children.
Many young adults subscribe to Robert Heinlein's philosophy that if you only had the time, you could love everyone, which of course, in his view, meant you could have sex with them, too. This same group of people doesn't understand the downside of all this "activity", but as they grow up, they start to figure it out.
Sure, you could "love" anyone -- or everyone, for that matter -- but is that how you want to live your life? This hedonistic approach is at heart so selfish it can never bring happiness. It's nearly impossible to find happiness if all you're doing is trying to please yourself. As people, we're bigger than that, we need larger, more noble goals to pursue, to have some sense of fulfillment.
I think we all owe it to ourselves to find the one person with whom we can share the richest, most satisfying relationship. I've tried both approaches and am here to testify: committed heterosexual monogamy (read: marriage) rules.