|
|
|
June 15, 2004 Tools of the 21st Century Part Deux Who knew there were so many? A few weeks back, I started my running list called Tools of the 21st Century, of what I feel are the most trite and self-serving non-profit organizations on the planet. As promised, the list continues, and not without thanks to one reader who noted another org deserving to be on my list. I guarantee there will be a part three: The American Civil Liberties Union North American Man/Boy Lovers Association The Sierra Club March of Dimes Anti-Defamation League Comments |
 "...playful philosophizing" Dan Leroy, National Review Online
|
|||
 |
|
|
|
Just where do we begin? Founded in 1920, the ACLU calls themselves the "nation's guardian of liberty", keeping America "safe and free". This is by the way, a position no one ever asked them to take, more a self-appointed duty. They have perfected the art of manipulating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In the name of "civil liberties" they are strategically breaking down whatever traditional values may be left. Speaking of "left", the ACLU professes to be non-partisan in all their dealings. Yeah, and so is Michael Moore. I'd like to see the books on that claim. Seems to me, they've endorsed just about every Democratic candidate possible. If there is an organization with the potential for more foolishness than the NAACP, it'd be the ACLU. Their slew of lawyers handle an average of 6,000 cases every year, going to bat against all things moral and righteous. This organization has probably single-handedly done more to promote moral decay in America by blurring the distinction between "rights" and "responsibilities" and replacing truth with their atheist and humanist agenda. From the Jesse Jackson school of politics, they use intimidation to win their court cases by playing on the flaky conscience of Americans who buy-in to the "protecting liberties" propaganda because they themselves have no moral grounding or throughline. This organization is a wolf in sheep's clothing, a lie masquerading in truth's clothing, and as my mother would say, "a hot mess". It's time to expose the foolishness.
Make no qualms about it. NAMBLA is just plain wicked. You don't have to pray about it, research it, or even be half-way intelligent to come to this realization. This is an organization who essentially defines pedophilia as a natural and misunderstood part of life. They must be Freudians at heart. Word to the wise, when NAMBLA endorses a political candidate, for the love of Lord crying out in the night, do not vote for that candidate! Red flag people; off-sides, error, technical foul. NAMBLA's goal is to "end the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships by educating the general public on the benevolent nature of man/boy love." "Oppressive" doesn't even begin to describe this hedonistic philosophy. I don't usually talk about candidates for hell, but if there ever were some people most likely to "burn", NAMBLA members would surely be on that list. This organization is spewing sickening madness and it wouldn't be such a concern if it didn't involve the well-being of innocent children. Anyone who even considers the agenda this organization is pushing needs psychological help. Let it also be known that the ACLU has gone to bat on more than one occasion for the rights of this organization. Need I say more?
This organization has championed a number of hot issues, among them, global warming, clean water, and protecting forests. The Sierra Club has a great deal of influence in the political arena. Now I'm all for protecting the Earth. It's personifying the Earth that I just can't get with. These yuppie tree huggers are terribly confused. Above all, the top issue that puts this organization on my list is their stance on world population. Sierra Club members are among the many that are convinced the world is about to explode from overpopulation. For this reason, they believe the environment is in danger of being over stressed. This is one of the biggest lies being taught in global studies courses across the world. They have somehow managed to link abortion rights and family planning with environmental protection. This theory of "overpopulation" is really just a cause for these organizations to go around to third world countries, providing what they call "optional family planning". This is where I draw the line. Instead of taking responsibility for being poor stewards over the Earth, we attribute the food shortage to "too many people" and start "hacking" them off via abortions and sterilization. I just don't buy it.
Here we have an organization that may have started out with a pure purpose however has now entered the dark side of nonprofits. March of Dimes began in an efforts to cure polio in babies. Seems like a worthy cause, however, considering my feeling about organizations centered around cures, this still makes them vulnerable to poor decisions. Since then, the organization has morphed into a "life-saver" of babies. Or so they say. Their mission states that they have helped to "Save millions of babies from death and disability". Today, it is well known that the March of Dimes has some unsettling involvement in the abortion industry. In an essay exposing the ties, an anonymous author wrote "MOD was one of the major forces behind the development and widespread use of amniocentesis in the second trimester of pregnancy. Amniocentesis is a test commonly used to determine if a preborn child has an incurable congenital abnormality, which often facilitates the decision to abort 'defective' children." One of the most pressing issues to be addressed in the 21st century is the value placed on human life. There are far too many influential nonprofit organizations that have a vested interest in the success of the abortion industry. This is not something anyone should view nonchalantly.
I'll approach this one with kid gloves. The ADL is what I call the Jewish counterpart to the NAACP. Colored people unite! Like the NAACP, they beat the air until people start ignoring them. The only trouble is, it's a lot harder to ignore our Jewish brethren; especially those who run more than half of Hollywood, so the ADL is a lot more powerful than its weaker, sillier, kid brother. The ADL really showed its true colors this past year when the Passion of the Christ was released. They made us all aware of just how far they were willing to go to push an agenda. I do not refute that the United States is guilty of anti-Semitism on many levels. As a Christian, I recognize the Biblical importance of the Jewish Heritage in the Messianic sense, but the ADL does not view themselves in that light. They have sought to strengthen the wall between the separation of church and state by rallying for school prayer to be removed (go figure?) and stricter guidelines placed on any sort of religion being taught in the classroom. Of course, "religion" being a broad topic, the emphasis in their position is generally against Christianity. The ADL has historically sided with far liberal and anti-God policy. Not only is the ADL a tool, they are rather conflicting if you ask me.
|
|
